The rank of approval according to social layer goes from 64.9% for the layer of majors income to 34.5% for lower social layer. The message of these two answers shows clearly the questioning the government who exists from the politician. The government has not known to suitably treat highly sensitive subjects for the population and it has generated great resistance that have arrived at the end in the facts happened in the month of June. The social conflicts of the last time also have been reflected in the vision of the survey ones. Only 21.3% of the survey ones see the present political situation like stable. A 57.3% see stable and a 21.2% little it nothing stable.
The level of instability of the political situation perceived by the survey ones increases as it lowers in the social layer, arriving at that only 9.1% of the population of smaller income see the political situation like stable. As far as the perspective ones on the social situation, 34.5% think that the political situation will be worse. In July of the 2008 34.7% of the survey ones anticipated a deterioration of the political situation reason why the present percentage does not represent worsening of the negative vision. The social malaise of the population has been made feel every time with more force. Most showy it is than the protests increase at the same time as the situation of the economy is improving (although it has not made it in the last months product of international the financial crisis).
Although it has increased the level of inequality, also it is certain that the poverty level is handicapped. In relation to previous, the relief sample that 58.3% of the survey ones consider that there was political manipulation in the social protests and that the same have not been spontaneous. Clear that if we watched the survey after social layer, poorest, than more likely they have participated in these protests, they consider in a 50% that the same have been spontaneous, whereas about the other end of the social layers, richest they think that in a 72.3% they responded to political manipulation.
The one that not of account that has finished a time never will be able to initiate another one. The failure of the ideologies was due to the totalitarian attempt to surround history, the nature and the life. We must do us of a kind pragmatism to the incitements of the present and the challenges of the circumstances having in the hand the answers of a renewed political philosophy. The accumulation of facts and more doing to the one than force this present to us of transition demands thought. The unitary origin of forces us to the life to the conception of a global humanism towards a comunitarismo of understanding and acceptance of the diversity.
The diversity of the world forces to us to revalue solidarity in a great gesture of brings back to consciousness. We have pending debts to settle: the intercultural dialogue, the admission and the respect of the differences, the rupture of ballasts to the old woman forms of political organization. The man of this time lives the rupture with a world that staggers. It is necessary to give answers him assuming that the thought is a reality form. The political theory must, then, face the 21st century. Perhaps the emptiness comes from the application to political sciences of the principle of which what empirically it was not demonstrated it would be outside meaning. A plurality of angles of view is necessary that the urgency to find a certainty buried.
No longer a homogenous corpus is required, which is required is a fluid and permanent interchange of diverse understandings. Some speak to offer not a systematic but symptomatic glance. We speak on a reality, not on the immortality of the crab. He is what others they denominate the theorising of the policy and the politicalization of the theory. For that reason we spoke of the problems of the world. It must have a relation between the political theory and the operation of the democracies, is necessary to give a common answer to the daily exigencies of the democracy, for the very simple reason that the globalisation has had a particular effect: all the men, largely, they have faced the same problems, which stops nothing takes to the forgetfulness of the particularitities, those that, on the contrary, become when asking recognition policies manifest. Without democratic thought renewed the tendency he will be strong to the confrontation and the totalitarianism.