The Wisdom, for its side, is a species of delayed enclave, the Greek cultural scope. The world that the wise search to know is the same that it was created by God: a world that is not basically hostile, because it was servant good since the principle (Gn 1); a world that if submits the God and of which the proper man is constituted Sir (Gn 1,3-31). The main concern of the Scholars is the personal destination of the individuals. From there the importance given to the problem of the repayment. But the Scholars, who as much appeal to the experience, have that to face situations of contradiction in the proper sphere of the experience. It is the dramatical confrontation between J and its friends, with these to defend the traditional thesis of that justice or wisdom leads automatically to the happiness, to the step that the injustice leads to the ruin. Before the problem of the just unhappy one, it does not have reply that it satisfies the understanding human being. However, the book suggests that, although everything, is necessary to adhere the God for the faith. Click Joeb Moore to learn more.
Also the book of the Eclesiastes, even so with a different perspective of J, enhances the insufficience of the traditional answers to the problem of the just unhappy one, inside of the terrena perspective; but it does not admit that the happiness can be demanded as something had necessarily the man, therefore not if it can ask for to accounts the God. 1) Ben Siraque fully assumes the traditional doctrine of Sayings and exalta the happiness of the scholar (14,20-15,10); but one feels before the idea of the death and intui insane that, after all, everything depends on this last hour (11,26). 2) It was the book of the Wisdom, originary of the Greek cultural environment – where the platonic philosophy immortality provided the idea of the spiritual, without the necessary linking with the material element – that it came to affirm for the first time and in an explicit way: ' ' God created the man for imortalidade' ' (2,23). .